Skip to main content
Category

Film Theory

Vitriolic rants and raving recommendations of movies, as well as insights into filmmaking technique.

Elia Kazan’s “A Life”

Kazan Sitting in the Theatre

A Life

Some books stare deep within, and offer you a perspective that – prior to – you didn’t think would ever be recorded. Sure, we know deep down that our experiences are not all that unique – that surely someone has lived similarly, made equally stupid decisions, and had a number of veritable successes to which we can relate. But it’s so UNLIKELY that they would write these down, or that we would find the records. And yet, here we are.

Kazan Book Cover

Elia Kazan is one of the greatest American film directors who ever lived. He discovered the talents of Tennessee Williams and made him a star playwright, he worked with Marlon Brando and brought his name to platinum status, and he built prolific careers for actors like Andy Griffith, Robert De Niro, Warren Beatty, Karl Malden, Patricia Neal, Julie Harris, and – albeit cut short by circumstance – James Dean. He worked side-by-side with prominent authors like Art Miller and Clifford Odets and John Steinbeck. And he contributed some of the greatest performances to America’s filmography. His life, however, was a goddamned mess.

 

I’ve read far fewer biographies than other works, but only a handful really standout. Thomas Hauser’s biography of Muhammed Ali was one of the more compelling, but it was not authored by the subject of interest. Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations was a lucid compilation of his life lessons, but far less confessional material than Kazan’s tome. (At nearly 850 pages, it takes some diligent commitment.)

Kazan Directing Actors

Despite being a talented writer, the book was painful. I don’t mean that it’s hard to read or boring; it brings up so much shit so fast that it can be difficult to adjust. I don’t know anyone who is that open about the minute, embarrassing details of his or her life – it’s doubtful we could even maintain a friendship. It’s the kind of material where you latch on to understand its application to your own life choices; but also push away the details that don’t relate to you, yet you empathise with the person suffering. One benefit is that there is adequate balance between the aspects Kazan wants to divulge as a way to process his personal trauma, and his thorough explanation of an artistic process that made him one of the absolute best film directors of all time.

Elia Kazan & Marlon Brando

One thing that stood out to me was how, when he’d get super close to the root cause of his life’s problems, he would ultimately divert the topic and bail. I think this is why screenwriters talk about never picking your own life as a subject: to effectively write, you need to fully understand the problem and its solution, and you can only get so close to solving a problem that still lingers. This should not spoil the book in any way, as he does make some profound realisations. It’s just a grueling observation of life in ways that make you confront your own inequities.

In conclusion, I’d like to include an excerpt near the end of the book. It’s a radically different tone from the rest of his writings, but I think the message was the closest he got to realising his own dramatic arc. I know it’s lengthy, but I feel it’s well worth it:

“…[Clifford Odets] glowered at his nurse, a fine, patient woman, and declared, ‘I want to shout, I want to sing, I want to yell!’ The nurse, who’d heard it all before, said, ‘Go on, shout, yell, sing if you want to!’ Then he tried, I remember he did try. But his shouting days were over. He was a might sick rooster. So he lay there and glowered angrily at the world in general and whatever it was that was cornering him now. No longer able to avoid the tragedy he’d lived or the tragedy that he was or the thought of what he might have been, he beckoned to me to lean closer, and he whispered – I remember the words well – ‘Gadg! [Kazan’s nickname] Imagine! Clifford Odets dying!’

“What I’m saying to you through this true story is that the chance we have here won’t happen again. The series of accidents and aspirations, along with real estate deals, civic concern, and guilt feelings, and the desire of the rich men to have their names remembered after they die, all those piled together produced this surprising opportunity for us. It won’t happen again. Not for many years! So let’s not lose it.

“The tragedy of the American theatre and of our lives is what could have been. Forces dispersed instead of gathered. Talents unused or used at a fraction of their worth. Potential unrealized. We all know our problems. We are not kids, we are not students. We know we are here on short leases. It is now time to stand up for ourselves before we disappear from the scene.

“The man who, in the forties, promised to be the Hamlet of our time has yet to play Hamlet, or anything like. The man who could have been the Lear of this generation is playing a sheriff on a TV series. I don’t think he plays sheriffs very well. He could have been a great Lear. The man who could have been the greatest actor in the history of American theatre is sulking on a grubby hilltop over Beverly Hills or on a beach on the island of Tahiti. What happened to them? They don’t know. Don’t look down on them. They are not weaklings. They were idealists too. Nor are they corrupt, confused, or sicker than most. They are your brothers.

“What is so terrible in our society is that people like ourselves are only rarely in control of their own lives and destinies. We don’t do what we want to do. We do what we think we have to do. Or what’s worse, what other people want us to do, what ‘they’ – whoever ‘they’ are – want us to do. We settle for co-starring roles on a TV series we despise, for the approval of our agents and a better contract this year than last. When we go from flop to flop we are terrified. When we find ourselves in a hit, we are bored to death.

“Now we are going to try to do something we respect for a change. It is hazardous. When you say something is difficult, you are saying it might not work. We are here to attempt a birth. All births are difficult. Look at a baby’s head. Don’t you wonder how it managed to get through? Like everything else worth doing, it is impossible.”

Why Did You Have to Ruin “Blade Runner” for This Generation?

Blade Runner 2049 Poster

Blade Runner

I came, I saw, I reviewed. This long-anticipated film represents a milestone for me, as the original “Blade Runner” was the single film responsible for my foray into a filmmaking career – the first film I had ever seen that could create powerful emotions through the nonverbal “dialogue” of light and shadow and mood and tone and music and silence. It still stands as a remarkable cinematic achievement; every frame remains beautiful still. Do you want to know what I think of the reboot? Well, well…in the style of Denis Villeneuve, I will hold off and take this opportunity to build suspense…ENDLESS SUSPENSE!

Roger Deakins was a godsend for this film. Although it really is a completely different movie from the original, it can hold its own visually. The colour palette is all over the place, but the craft is visible. I really love much of the look, but there are moments where the lack of colour contrast is unpalatable. Specifically, where the original would have a blue image littered with orange specks to provide depth, this version blandly applies global grading to the image (like in this example):

There are times when the film tries to echo back to the style and certain lighting effects of the older film – like when they use the shimmering caustics effect that Ridley Scott had been challenged on. Without an obvious source like water to produce the caustics, it seemed out of place – or so the gaffers and cinematographer argued. Scott stood his ground, and it’s one of the more memorable scenes; audiences didn’t need to see the source, but the feeling was important. However, they reeeeeeeeally overdo the throwback, along with a couple hilarious attempts.

Back in 1972, Bruce Lee started to make a film called “Game of Death,” starring his students Dan Inosanto and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, as well as several other gung fu geniuses like Sammo Hung and Yuen Biao. Lee halted the filming when the opportunity arose to shoot an American-Hong Kong co-produced blockbuster called “Enter the Dragon.” He would never complete “Game of Death,” suffering fatally from cerebral edema at the age of 32.

The 11 minutes and 7 seconds of footage from the production of “Game of Death” was later repurposed to make a complete film, with Bruce Lee being replaced by several actors – including Billy Lo and Kim Tai-jong. To sell the illusion of Lee appearing in more of the film than he really did, they included his ACTUAL funeral procession, along with ridiculous-looking stand-ins and cardboard cutouts taped to a mirror as actor Kim Tai-jong positioned his body not-so-perfectly in place.

It’s laughable, painfully bad – and irreverent. …Ahem, when Rachel from the original “Blade Runner” makes an appearance, the CG face-swap is at least this bad and unnecessary – albeit with greater technological execution. You didn’t think I was going to come back around, did you?

There were things I loved about this movie, despite thinking that you could EASILY chop off 45+ minutes and make HUGE improvements in the pacing. A slow movie makes not a poetic one…. And you know me…I looooooooooove slow-ass boring shit. I once got fully erect throughout an entire film that was just a single, 94-minute take – no cuts.

Rock. Fucking. Hard. At the hands of a capable director, this film could’ve been a new step in the evolution of the sci-fi genre. Buuuuuuuuuuut totally fucking hated it with every ounce of my being. When they showed some shots from the original (they chose the least attractive ones in the hopes it wouldn’t diminish their own photography), it reminded me of how beautiful the original is – and how much I wished I’d been watching that instead. And although I can understandably guess at some of the reasoning, the choice to go with spherical lenses for the sequel left me miffed.

I can’t even hold back as much as Villeneuve would. There is so much in this movie that doesn’t make any fucking sense! And not the kind of “I like Christopher Nolan and think his obscure references are just smart” kind of way. Fuck me, I was WISHING for that kind of pedantry.

I swear half of the film was unnecessary and most of the characters were expendable – even if we just assumed their SOLE FUNCTION was for exposition. Didn’t need them. The cop boss? Get rid of her. The weird holographic love interest? What the fuck…why? Abort her. Ryan Goslings character? …Eh, maybe. Jared Leto? Abso-fucking-lutely!!! His acting wasn’t bad, but he was the very definition of superfluous.

And what’s up with their stupid, baiting dialogue that simply reverses halfway through their laBORious soliloquies? “You love pain because it reminds you of being alive. You’ve never felt pain.” Shoot me in the face. I don’t care, I’ll have a closed casket. Seriously, just end this misery.

I found myself gritting my teeth through every predictable, painfully slow scene. Villeneuve is like this guy that thinks his stories are super interesting, but you already know how they’re going to turn out, but he won’t let you leave…he just keeps talking like this is the first time you’ve ever experienced a twist of fate.

“And so then I’m like, make sure these gifts are labelled right because it would be a DISASTER if they were switched, you know? Like, you know? And guess what! Oh my God, you’re never going to believe-“ “They were swi-“ “You’re like never going to believe it. So I go to the party, and they’re all lining up to do the gift exchange. And I see my boxes-“ “They were switched, right?” “Hang on. They line up all the presents and Sherry takes hers and Keegan takes his and, like, oh my Gawwwwwwd, they each open their presents and guess what!” “They were switched?” “They were SWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITCHED!!! Hahahahahahaha! It was the FUNNIEST THING EVAR!!!”

Just fast-forward the story, you flaccid fucking dick-wrangler! JESUS!

I think it’s worth going if you actually leave at minute 35. If you stay longer, you’ll be pulling your hair out. The sad part is that they have all of the good stuff in the can, and could really make something fantastic if a capable editor/director duo managed it. Cutting out all the useless inserts of photos and objects and bullshit would shave at least 20 minutes; nixing the rest of the shitty, pointless “subplots” (more like wastes of my fucking time, amirite?) would add another 45 minutes or so.

This goddamned crap-stand is nearly 3 hours, people…for a synopsis, the entirety of which, I could pantomime in an hour. If this piece played at 90 minutes, I think you’d have an award-winner. And that’s the real tragedy here: getting so close to creating an excellent piece of cinema, only to have it ruined by a hack, egotistical, shit director who resembles a knitted scarf more than he does a man.

“Hereditary” (2018) is a Piece of Shit

HEREDITARY Header

Hereditary

In Hamlet, the underlying dramatic premise is that the sins of the parents are passed onto their children. In the same vein, “Hereditary” does a great job…of not coming anywhere fucking close. In fact, I’m not sure what the hell they were trying to achieve at all. This film was a shit-stain waste of my fucking time, and the most exposition-driven drivel I’ve seen all year. It is not a difficult film; it is not complicated. It’s tiringly lazy and predictable.

Don’t worry if you’re not sure how you feel about this movie because the music will tell you exactly what to feel and when. I mean, I don’t blame the composer: if I had to work on a project that fucked up this bad, I’d polish the shit out of that turd. And in all fairness, the music HAS to be over the top, lest you laugh out loud in moments that are intended to be serious.

I’m going to spoil this movie, so if you have any intention of watching it (please don’t, you really deserve better), stop here.

In a good movie, each scene has a particular objective that moves the main character closer to or further from his/her ultimate goal – the thing he or she wants (and succeeds or fails to get) by the end of the movie. There isn’t a single scene objective in the entire film, which is remarkable in its own right. Every scene is merely exposition…trying to get you to give a shit about ANYONE in this picture through painfully labourious dialogue. And it doesn’t stop there: these creatively bankrupt shits will show you insert after insert of foreshadowing, like phone messages, emails that read “United Psychiatrics” so you know they’re reaching out to a therapist, pamphlets with “Séance!” brightly coloured, and giant signs reading “Losing a Loved One Support Group” in front of a circle of people sitting inside a high school cafeteria after hours. I mean, do you really think we won’t know it’s a goddamned support group the minute the mom starts talking? And she just launches into it, like “Let me tell you every nonsensical detail about my life, starting from when I didn’t get a pony all the way until my dad starved himself to death because of a psychological disorder that has no bearing in this particular movie….” Jesus, lady, save some therapy for the rest of us. You think YOUR story is bad? I had to PAY for this movie…DO YOU KNOW HOW I’VE SUFFERED!?!

Family at Dinner Table - HereditaryThis movie doesn’t know what it wants to be; “Rosemary’s Baby,” “The Babadook,” “It Follows,” who knows? And you see every troupe there is within the horror genre. Here’s a short list of the trite, derivative bullshit you’ll experience because this filmmaker is a tasteless sonofabitch:

  • flipping through a book of creepy kid drawings
  • tense family dinners
  • jump scares
  • cheap foreshadowing
  • random scary dream sequences
  • startling awake (in a bed or at school sitting at a desk)
  • seeing distorted reflexions of one’s self
  • taking nondescript pills or medicine
  • mentions of schizophrenia and Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)
  • rummaging through arcane books or revealing family photos
  • searching for family secrets in a spooky attic
  • walking in a creepy way (like on the ceiling or in upward bow position)
  • crying at a stoplight in one’s car….

…Holy fuck, I didn’t even realise there were this many. I guess that’s why this two-hour film felt like it was lumbering into three-hour territory. But I swear if one more person tries making an innocuous, generic noise like a tongue click into something scary, I’m going to beat them to death.

The camerawork in this film is trash; none of the movement is motivated: it’s just cheap, mildly interesting shot after another. The camera arbitrarily pushes in slowly, then arbitrarily pulls back out. For no god-dang reason!

There’s a scene that I can only describe as being so comedically tasteless, I wondered if it was a deleted scene from “Final Destination” that was written by Adam Sandler and directed by the Farrelly Brothers. The little girl is suffering an allergic reaction to peanuts (don’t worry, they labouriously ask about peanuts from the very first scene) and tries to get more air by sticking her head out the window. While her brother is driving 60-80 mph (so fast!), he sees a dead animal in the road and swerves just enough to knock her head off on a nearby telephone pole. Don’t even get me started on how this would even happen…. The point is that this scene is fucking HILARIOUS. It’s so asinine that you can’t help but laugh, even though it’s supposed to be (and would be) horrifying.

Outside of the dialogue trying to fill you in on everything, it’s also syntactically stupid. When referring to a set of voodoo-summoning instructions, the dad cynically asks, “What language even is that?” Umm, let’s say it was in English…would you even fucking know? I can’t say enough about how much talking there is to fill in gaps. In many cases, you can see the actors’ mouths moving where they ADR’d new words because I’m assuming the previous lines didn’t make sense. This whole fucking MOVIE doesn’t make sense, and not because it’s enigmatic…oh no, I get what you guys are trying to do. You’re just fucking terrible at doing it. The end is so out of left field that they actually have to explain off-screen how the daughter was originally a reincarnation of some devil, but they finally found a male body to host him properly. But you only catch wind of this narrative arc an hour and ten minutes into the picture…. What the bloody fucking hell, you twats?

There’s a scene at the high school where a professor is discussing the story structure of a Sophocles play. I wish they had asked the actor to talk a little longer, maybe to help them with their own disaster of a story. Maybe he could’ve helped them to add some extra drama to this trash, and made it a little more interesting. Really anything would’ve helped. This poor excuse for a movie could only go up, as it had clearly hit rock fucking bottom.